Reporting and Discussing Effect Size: Still the Road Less Traveled?
- James H. McMillan
- Foley Jennifer
Abstract
This study shows the extent to which effect size is reported and discussed in four major journals. A series of judgments about different aspects of effect size were conducted for 417 articles from four journals. Results suggest that while the reporting of simple effect size indices is more prevalent, substantive discussions of the meaning of effect size is lacking. Accessed 17,478 times on https://pareonline.net from October 18, 2011 to December 31, 2019. For downloads from January 1, 2020 forward, please click on the PlumX Metrics link to the right.
Keywords: Evaluation Methods, Educational Research, Research Methodology, Statistical Analysis
How to Cite:
McMillan, J. H. & Jennifer, F., (2011) “Reporting and Discussing Effect Size: Still the Road Less Traveled?”, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 16(1): 14. doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/b6pz-ws55
Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF