Paper

Interpreting Verbal Irony: Linguistic Strategies and the Connection to the Type of Semantic Incongruity

Authors
  • Debanjan Ghosh (McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT)
  • Elena Musi (University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK)
  • Kartikeya Upasani (Facebook Conversational AI, CA)
  • Smaranda Muresan (Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY)

Abstract

Human communication often involves the use of verbal irony or sarcasm, where the speakers usually mean the opposite of what they say. To better understand how verbal irony is expressed by the speaker and interpreted by the hearer we conduct a crowdsourcing task: given an utterance expressing verbal irony, users are asked to verbalize their interpretation of the speaker\'s ironic message. We propose a typology of linguistic strategies for verbal irony interpretation and link it to various theoretical linguistic frameworks. We design computational models to capture these strategies and present empirical studies aimed to answer three questions: (1) what is the distribution of linguistic strategies used by hearers to interpret ironic messages?; (2) do hearers adopt similar strategies for interpreting the speaker\'s ironic intent?; and (3) does the type of semantic incongruity in the ironic message (explicit vs. implicit) influence the choice of interpretation strategies by the hearers?

Keywords: irony, verbal irony, sarcasm, sarcasm interpretation, user study, mechanical turk, pragmatics

How to Cite:

Ghosh, D., Musi, E., Upasani, K. & Muresan, S., (2020) “Interpreting Verbal Irony: Linguistic Strategies and the Connection to the Type of Semantic Incongruity”, Society for Computation in Linguistics 3(1), 76-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/91ey-3n44

Downloads:
Download PDF

96 Views

36 Downloads

Published on
01 Jan 2020